MPs vote to equate abandonment of post with resignation

Employees who abandon their jobs will now be presumed to have resigned: the National Assembly voted on Wednesday, October 5, amendments from the majority and the Republicans to limit access to unemployment insurance, despite criticism from the left.

“The employee who has voluntarily abandoned his position and does not return to work after being given formal notice for this purpose (…) is presumed to have resigned”stipulate the amendments adopted by 219 votes against 68 within the framework of the examination in first reading of the bill of reform of the unemployment insurance.

Opposition from the left

The government said it was in favor of this measure on job abandonment, “a constantly growing phenomenon”. Employees who no longer come to work, without justification, and end up being dismissed by their employer, can then receive unemployment insurance.

The left has taken issue with this phenomenon, citing cases “marginal”she pleaded not to “weakening the protection of employees”. “What is the cause of these job abandonments? »asked communist Pierre Dharréville, suggesting a link with working conditions.

Stormy atmosphere

Conversely, Dominique Da Silva (Renaissance), on the same line as Horizons and MoDem, argued that job abandonments disrupted companies and that it was a question of planning a measure “clear and fair”. “We are not depriving employees of any rights. They always have the possibility of an appeal. before the industrial tribunal, also underlined Jean-Louis Thiériot (LR), criticizing some on the left “the choice of the right to laziness”.

In a stormy atmosphere again, the Socialists assured that the measure adopted was unconstitutional, and not compatible with the standards of the International Labor Organization (ILO).

NR amendment rejected

Unemployment insurance is in principle reserved for people who are involuntarily deprived of employment. For resigners, there are some limited exceptions. But a dismissal for abandonment of position constitutes a dismissal for fault and does not currently deprive the dismissed person of his right to benefit from unemployment insurance, although abandonment of position is ” voluntary “.

An amendment carried by Marine Le Pen (RN), on the other hand, was rejected: it provided that the refusal to accept a permanent contract at the end of a fixed-term contract be considered as a resignation. “There are some people who cheat” by alternating CDD and unemployment benefits while refusing CDI, advanced the president of the far-right group.

The majority was also interested in the subject. Amendments providing for the same measure, after three CDI refusals, had been tabled by Horizons and MoDem deputies. But they were withdrawn by their authors, at the request of the government, which wishes to rework such a provision. Marine Le Pen pinned the “government virgin modesty” in the matter.

Source link

Related posts

6 out of 10 trains canceled from Friday to Sunday


Inflation stabilizes in November at 6.2% year on year


the State simplifies assistance with the electricity bill of SMEs


surprise slowdown in inflation in November

Sign up for our Newsletter and
stay informed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *